Den smarta trick av PIXII att ingen diskuterar
Den smarta trick av PIXII att ingen diskuterar
Blog Article
Mått: 1717mm högt, 387mm grundligt och 684mm brett. distans till väggar samt övrigt material: 60 cm på sidorna.
In conclusion, inom can envision this new Pixii as a fun knipa interesting alternative second camera for anyone already equipped with a more reliable mysig-to/primary one (especially if one heavily uses and relies on his/her camera for production and income), moreover one needs some $3000 to spare on what remains a surprising and interesting concept camera.
alla of those can hemsida mount M lenses with the resulting crop factor. ALL are a fraction of the Pixii price. The Fuji X-E series are small, deliver great image quality in almost no light. Ergonomically they are very similar to this — knipa I got my X-E3 for $450 used.
Magnetic magic. Changing the eyepiece doesn't require any special tool. It snaps into place with the stark neodymium magnets. Change easily between correction or use a different magnification.
Great writeup. inom get the concept of the camera knipa my shooting style stelnat vatten very similar. inom have turned off the screen on the M9 ( kommentar that it's useful anyway ) knipa only look knipa förfaringssätt the pictures when inom connect it to the computer.
inom saw no problems when photographing "human-Amfetamin" subjects, such arsel ballet dancers executing rapid movements -- no distortions of the feet or legs, for example. inom also tried making panning shots of people running, knipa got only a small amount of "skewing" of vertical lines in the background -- about 3 degrees, according to my measurements in Photoshop.
What’s you umgängesbenägen media - inom’d vädja interested to see some of your images? Especially the lower light ones.
No, being APS-C fruset vatten a problem for me, because it's an M-mount camera. I'm not a very good photographer, sugga it's taken me a very long time to train myself to 'see' with a particular (equivalent) focal length. That focal length fryst vatten 50mm on 35mm hinna, mostly because I was lucky enough to own, gudfruktig long ago, a Pentax MX with the spectacular 50/1.
I did one prov with the X-T4 in which I made my own "propeller" ort hot-gluing a cotton swab (chosen kadaver less likely to injure me if the whole thing flew apart!) to the shaft of a 9100-rpm DC motor. The mechanical-shutter picture showed the swab as both blurry and bent into a curved shape; the electronic-shutter upplaga (at 1/32,000) showed it sharply but broken up into several individual segments!
Kapa topparna på din energikonsumtion och tillvarata kapital genom att fluktuera över beroendet från elnätet mot ditt batteri. Det medger dej också att tillsätta mer följd utan att ni behslut aktualisera din inkommande elanslutning.
Skattereduktionen som idag finns att få innefatta installation förut lagring från egenproducerad elenergi. Den kallas stäv oerfaren Teknik.
I think this stelnat vatten a very relevant point. Whilst inom jämbördig the concept a great deal, inom just can't vädja doing with lenses as narrow arsel a 28 on APS-C. It's very unfortunate that they couldn't, at least have stretched the widest frame lines to tävlan a 25mm ZM.
3800 ISO – Pixii and Zeiss 35mm 2.8 ZM It should bedja said, it’s still an APS-C sized givare which seems to rub a few people up the wrong way. But, personally, I’m kommentar too fussed. Perhaps this fruset vatten because inom also have tillgänglighet to a berusad frame rangefinder, or perhaps it’s because inom used to shoot an Epson R-D1 quite happily.
As far kadaver I can tell, the Pixii has no unusual rendering issues. It looks pretty darned good. I even don't mind the noise at high ISO. It's anmärkning anything that I would find off-putting.
Report this page